Overseas divorce can undermine bid for spousal assist

Article content material

Households at this time are more and more cell, typically pushed by a work-from-anywhere mindset. However when a pair that has ties to a couple of nation decides to separate, the query of which nation’s legal guidelines govern the cut up can have vital penalties.

For a partner in Ontario, the jurisdictional controversy arising from separation is especially acute when a divorce is granted exterior of Canada. Merely put, the granting of a international divorce will extinguish the power of a separated partner in Ontario to acquire spousal assist below the legal guidelines of Canada and Ontario.

Article content material

Article content material

This situation was not too long ago earlier than the Courtroom of Enchantment for Ontario in two unrelated circumstances, choices for which had been launched in February.

Within the first case, the couple was married in 2012 in Russia, the place they resided on the time. The couple and their little one moved to Ontario in March 2018 and have resided right here ever since. Simply days after transferring out of the household house in November 2019, the husband utilized for a divorce in Russia.

Although the spouse objected that the divorce ought to be decided in Ontario, arguing that she wouldn’t be eligible to obtain spousal assist from her husband below the legal guidelines of Russia, the Russian court docket granted the divorce in January 2020.

In July of that yr, the spouse commenced court docket proceedings in Ontario looking for spousal assist. All through the Ontario court docket continuing, it was understood that if the Russian divorce order was acknowledged in Canada, the spouse can be unable to pursue spousal assist in Ontario.

The spouse argued the husband sought and obtained the Russian divorce for the particular goal of avoiding his obligation to pay spousal assist. In different phrases, the husband engaged in forum-shopping, the observe of selecting a court docket location that may lead to a extra beneficial final result.

Article content material

Article content material

At trial, Justice Jana Steele of the Ontario Superior Courtroom of Justice agreed with the spouse and located the Russian divorce shouldn’t be acknowledged in Ontario. The choose famous that “the Russian divorce, which was obtained lower than two months after separation, offers (the husband) a back-door with which to flee his authorized tasks, and runs counter to the 4 spousal assist aims set out in s. 15.2(6) of the Divorce Act.”

The husband appealed. In a ruling launched Feb. 28, Justice Jonathon George of the Courtroom of Enchantment for Ontario additionally agreed with the spouse and dismissed the husband’s enchantment. In response to the choose, whereas “forum-shopping won’t at all times violate our ideas of morality, ‘unfair forum-shopping ways’ most actually will.”

In reaching his conclusion, Justice George pointed to the sturdy emphasis positioned on the values of partnership and equality in Canadian household regulation. It’s these values which underpin a partner’s entitlement to spousal assist in Ontario.

In the end, the Russian divorce order was not acknowledged in Ontario and the spouse was in a position to pursue spousal assist.

Article content material

The second case earlier than the Courtroom of Enchantment reached the other final result.

In that case, the couple was married in 1998 in Bangladesh, the place they resided with their three youngsters for many of the marriage. In 2015, the husband and kids obtained landed immigrant standing and moved to Canada the next yr. The spouse remained in Bangladesh.

Though the husband had sponsored the spouse for Canadian everlasting resident standing, he later gave her written discover of his intention to divorce her pursuant to the legal guidelines of Bangladesh. The spouse moved to Canada in February 2017, one month earlier than the Bangladeshi divorce grew to become efficient.

Three years later, the spouse commenced court docket proceedings in Ontario whereby she sought a divorce and different reduction, together with that the husband pay spousal assist.

The central situation within the Ontario court docket proceedings, once more, was the popularity of the international divorce. Whereas the spouse mentioned the Bangladeshi divorce shouldn’t be acknowledged in Ontario, the truth that she had remarried in reliance on the Bangladeshi divorce weighed in favour of recognizing the international divorce in Ontario. Within the end result, the Bangladeshi divorce was acknowledged in Ontario.

Article content material

Writing for the Courtroom of Enchantment for Ontario, Justice Julie Thorburn famous that the spousal assist provisions in Ontario’s Household Legislation Act don’t “embody the phrase ‘former partner’ when describing who might apply for assist.” The choose continues: “Ontario circumstances have due to this fact interpreted the Household Legislation Act as not allowing a former partner, similar to (the spouse), to hunt spousal assist.”

Justice Thorburn famous that “until and till the wording within the Household Legislation Act is modified to outline ‘partner’ to explicitly embody a former partner, or this line of circumstances is revisited, a celebration similar to (the spouse), to a international divorce, can not search spousal assist below the Household Legislation Act.”

The choose concluded her evaluation by acknowledging that the laws, in its present type, “may lead to vital hardship” for individuals who could also be entitled to spousal assist in Ontario however for a divorce having been granted exterior of Canada. Justice Thorburn identified that laws in Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island ensures a declare for spousal assist will survive a international divorce.

Article content material

For Justice Thorburn, the treatment is easy: “Addition of the phrases ‘or former partner’ to s. 30 of the Household Legislation Act to make sure that spouses who divorce in international jurisdictions can deliver functions for assist in Ontario is a matter that, for my part, might be addressed by the Ontario legislature.”

For Ontario {couples} with connections to exterior nations, the circumstances are a reminder to fastidiously perceive their rights, entitlements and obligations, each earlier than deciding to relocate and when separating or looking for a divorce.

Adam N. Black is a associate within the household regulation group at Torkin Manes LLP in Toronto.

ablack@torkinmanes.com